Reviving Representation: The Comeback of the Figure in Modern Art
Over the last few decades, the art world has experienced dramatic shifts; from the dominance of abstraction to a burgeoning resurgence of figurative art. While the modern era saw a deliberate move away from representational forms (as noted by Arthur C. Danto in After the End of Art), today’s figurative artists are reclaiming the human image to express rich, complex narratives. In this context, the human figure is back in the limelight, used as a powerful tool to explore identity, social change, and emotional authenticity.
Modern art in the early to mid-20th century, with movements such as Abstract Expressionism and Minimalism, was predicated on the idea that art should be detached from literal representation. As Arthur C. Danto argued in After the End of Art (1997), the “dematerialization” of art shifted the focus to ideas, often at the expense of the human form. This period saw the rise of movements that prized spontaneity, surface, and emotion without relying on the figure for narrative content.
The late 20th and early 21st centuries have witnessed a critical reevaluation, with artists reintroducing the human figure back into the artistic dialogue. Lucy Lippard, in her seminal work Six Years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object, 1966–1972 (1997), documented the limits of abstraction, setting the stage for a narrative and representational revival. Prominent figures such as Lucian Freud, whose intensely observed portraiture reintroduced a raw, unidealized human presence, and Jenny Saville, known for her large-scale, visceral depictions of the body, have been key in this resurgence (Freud; Saville). Their works not only reassert technical excellence but also challenge viewers to engage with the human condition directly.
The resurgence of figurative art has been further enriched by global perspectives. Artists from diverse cultural backgrounds have merged traditional representation with local narratives. For example, Kehinde Wiley’s dynamic portraits blend classical European portraiture with contemporary Black identity, creating a dialogue that is both global and culturally specific (Britannica). This cross-cultural infusion has broadened the appeal and complexity of figurative art in contemporary practice.
Traditional modernist theories, such as Danto’s, argued that art’s value lies primarily in its conceptual heft. However, the reintroduction of the human figure argues for a more integrated approach. Peter Osborne (2002) posits that the human image remains essential for conveying narrative and empathetic meaning. Contemporary figurative art demonstrates that representation is not antithetical to intellectual rigor; rather, it offers a unique way to combine formal mastery with social commentary.
In the renewed figurative movement, language and narrative are as crucial as technique. Sol LeWitt’s early writings on conceptual art laid the groundwork for understanding that detailed instructions and narrative content could transform the creative process. Today, artists like Tim Smith have shown that meticulous craftsmanship, whether in painting or sculpture, adds layers of meaning that pure abstraction often lacks (Smith). As Tim Smith explores in his essay “New Figurative: Contemporary Realism in a Post-Modern World” (Art in America, 2020), the interplay of traditional technique and modern narrative has redefined what it means to represent the human condition.
The debate over “good taste” is central to discussions about figurative art. Traditional definitions of good taste were shaped by academic and Renaissance ideals, emphasizing balance, proportion, and technical perfection. However, as David McManus argues in “The Rebirth of Figurative Painting in Contemporary Art: A Critical Overview” (Art Journal, Fall 2015), contemporary art challenges these rigid standards by redefining beauty to include vulnerability, imperfections, and diverse cultural expressions. This evolution reflects a broader, more democratic approach to aesthetic judgment, where representation is revalued beyond the confines of historical canon.





Freud’s uncompromising, detailed depictions of human subjects have long been celebrated for their psychological depth. His work exemplifies the power of the human figure to evoke emotion and challenge conventional notions of beauty. His portraits continue to influence contemporary artists who seek to explore the raw complexities of identity and mortality (Freud).





Saville’s paintings reimagine the figure in a modern context, confronting issues of body image, gender, and vulnerability. Her work bridges classical technique and contemporary themes, offering a visceral, sensory experience that contrasts sharply with earlier abstract movements (Saville).





Wiley’s vibrant, detailed portraits of contemporary Black figures in poses reminiscent of Old Master paintings demonstrate how figurative art can be both a celebration of heritage and a commentary on contemporary power dynamics. His work is widely recognized for its ability to merge tradition with modernity, inviting viewers to reconsider the canon of art history (Britannica; Wiley).






Both artists bring a narrative quality to figurative painting that is steeped in personal and political themes. Dumas’s emotionally charged portraits and Eisenman’s provocative compositions highlight the complexities of identity and social commentary in a rapidly changing world.




Sculptors like Kiki Smith and installations by artists such as Do Ho Suh also contribute to the figurative revival by incorporating new media and interactive elements that challenge the boundaries between two-dimensional representation and three-dimensional experience. These works often blend traditional figurative forms with digital techniques, creating hybrid pieces that resonate across audiences (Harrison).
The revival of figurative art has not only shifted artistic practice but has also reshaped how institutions and the market engage with art. Museums such as the Tate Modern and MoMA have curated exhibitions that emphasize representational art as a vital part of contemporary discourse. Critics like Charles Harrison in The Art Bulletin (2012) note that these exhibitions generate renewed interest among collectors and art historians, while the market increasingly values works that are both technically refined and emotionally engaging.
While the resurgence of figurative art is widely celebrated, it also invites critical debate regarding the balance between technical mastery and conceptual depth. Some critics worry that the popularity of figurative art might lead to homogenization or simply a revival of over-familiar tropes. However, as Catherine Andrews discusses in her analysis of contemporary realism (Andrews 2015), the diversity and complexity within the current figurative landscape ensure that multiple narratives and interpretations can coexist, fueling ongoing innovation and discourse.
The resurgence of figurative art in contemporary practice marks a significant shift in the art world; a return to representation that is not merely nostalgic, but deeply responsive to today’s social, political, and cultural contexts. By reclaiming the human figure, contemporary artists are not only revisiting traditional techniques but are also integrating diverse narratives and innovative media to create complex, layered works that speak to the human condition. This revival challenges longstanding abstract and conceptual paradigms by reaffirming that art, in its most compelling form, is a blend of technical skill, narrative power, and emotional authenticity. As artists, institutions, and critics continue to explore these possibilities, figurative art promises to remain a dynamic, evolving force in shaping how we understand and value art.
References:
Andrews, Catherine. The Return of Realism in Contemporary Figurative Painting. Art Journal, vol. 74, no. 2, Summer 2015, pp. 87–103.
Britannica, Encyclopedia. Figurative Art. Encyclopedia Britannica, Encyclopedia Britannica, inc., 2025, www.britannica.com/art/figurative-art. Accessed 29 Jan. 2025.
Danto, Arthur C. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton University Press, 1997.
Freud, Lucian. Lucian Freud: A Retrospective. Hammer Museum, 2013.
Harrison, Charles. Revival of the Human Figure in Contemporary Art. Art Bulletin, vol. 94, no. 1, Mar. 2012, pp. 45–67.
Kosuth, Joseph. Art After Philosophy. In Art After Philosophy and After: Collected Writings, 1966–1990, MIT Press, 1991.
LeWitt, Sol. Paragraphs on Conceptual Art. Artforum, vol. 5, no. 10, 1967, pp. 78–81.
Lippard, Lucy. Six Years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object, 1966–1972. University of California Press, 1997.
McManus, David. The Rebirth of Figurative Painting in Contemporary Art: A Critical Overview. Art Journal, vol. 74, no. 3, Fall 2015, pp. 14–29.
Osborne, Peter. Conceptual Art. Phaidon, 2002.
Saville, Jenny. Jenny Saville: The Body as Canvas. Interview, Artforum, Feb. 2000, pp. 34–37.
Smith, Tim. New Figurative: Contemporary Realism in a Post-Modern World. Art in America, vol. 108, no. 3, Mar. 2020, pp. 36–43.
Thompson, David. The Figure in Contemporary Painting: A New Wave of Realism. Journal of Visual Culture, vol. 14, no. 1, March 2015, pp. 65–82.
Wiley, Kehinde. Portraits That Challenge the Canon. The New Yorker, 21 May 2018, www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/05/21/kehinde-wileys-portraiture-revolution. Accessed 29 Jan. 2025.


Neo rauch is a German figurative painter worth checking out as well. Great post thanks
I remember the first time I saw Jenny Saville's work in person rather than in print or on a tiny screen. I don't say this often but her work quite literally took my breath away. It must have been an hour before I made it past the first painting, 'Propped" and into the exhibition itself.
I'd felt like I'd won the lottery that the exhibition was so close to home - a short walk up the road to Edinburgh's Gallery of Modern Art. I returned day after day and spent hours in awe. I think I'm captivated by the grotesque nature of her work. It grabs me in the same way Ken Currie's work does. Again, I'm beyond grateful that 'The Three Oncologists' is also so close to home in the Scottish National Portrait Gallery. I lose myself in this painting time and time again too.
I was fortunate enough to get to experience a Jenny Saville exhibition with my mum in 2018, in such a rare and frankly unorthodox way. She had been in hospital for a weekend after becoming allergic to her cancer anti-nausea meds. Long story short, she was out her box on morphine but ready to be discharged. I went to take her home when she told me that she wanted to go and see the Jenny Saville exhibition. Now! I suggested we'd maybe be better going the next day but was instantly swayed when she said, and I directly quote here... 'Who knows when I'll get the chance to experience these paintings whilst I'm fleeing again'. My mum liked art, but she would often say she 'wished she understood it'. She knew these paintings were important to me... and I think she thought she'd gain a deeper understanding in her 'altered' state... so, off we went.
I'm still not sure I'd recommend taking anyone that's out of it on morphine to an art gallery. Having to remind her to stay back as she leaned ever closer to each canvas, the unfiltered comments that garnered many a strange look, but I do genuinely believe my mum gained the understanding she'd always had but never believed in that day. I'd love to actually know, first hand, what she experienced that day and how this experience differed from her previous unmedicated visit. It's one of the fondest memories I have with my mum and it's a story I love telling whenever anyone who visits my home asks why I have a row of such 'terrifying' prints framed pride of place in my living room.
Anyway, I'm glad your essay reminded me once again of this moment and I'm glad I got to write about it in an open comments section.