Ink, Icon, and Island Gods: The Fight to Keep Polynesian Art Alive
Polynesia Part 2
Polynesian art encompasses the visual, material, and performative traditions of an immense cultural region defined by the Polynesian Triangle, whose vertices are Hawaiʻi to the north, Aotearoa (New Zealand) to the southwest, and Rapa Nui (Easter Island) to the southeast. Within this vast maritime space, communities such as those in American Samoa, French Polynesia, Hawaiʻi, Tokelau, and Rapa Nui share linguistic, genealogical, and cultural roots, but their art forms have evolved along distinct trajectories shaped by local environments, resources, and colonial histories. Art in Polynesia has traditionally functioned as a living embodiment of mana, the spiritual power inherent in people, objects, and places, serving both sacred and practical purposes (Kirch 234–235).
In each territory, indigenous art forms range from monumental stone sculptures to intricate fiberwork, wood carvings, and body art. These visual traditions are deeply embedded in oral histories and religious cosmologies, where imagery is never merely decorative but encodes genealogies, mythic narratives, and political authority (Kaeppler 8). For example, in Hawaiʻi, kiʻi (carved images of gods) served as embodiments of deities within heiau (temples), while in Rapa Nui, the moai statues represented deified ancestors watching over their descendants (Van Tilburg 54–56). Across the Polynesian Triangle, such works are linked by shared formal qualities, stylized human figures, geometric motifs, and symbolic abstraction, yet each island group developed its own iconographic vocabulary and technical specializations.
Archaeological and linguistic evidence situates the origins of Polynesian culture within the Lapita cultural complex, which spread eastward from the Bismarck Archipelago into Remote Oceania between ca. 1600–1000 BCE (Kirch 125–127; Summerhayes 85). Lapita pottery, decorated with intricate dentate-stamped motifs, was the earliest known art form in this cultural lineage, and many of its geometric patterns (chevrons, concentric circles, and stylized anthropomorphic figures) have analogues in later Polynesian tattoo, carving, and textile designs (Kirch and Green 137). By the late first millennium CE, Polynesian voyagers had settled the major archipelagos of the central Pacific, transporting with them a shared set of religious beliefs, social structures, and artistic repertoires.
In these early settlements, art was closely tied to environmental adaptation. In resource-rich islands like Hawaiʻi, artisans developed large-scale stone architecture and sculpture, while in smaller atolls such as Tokelau, lightweight wood and fiber arts predominated due to material scarcity. Across the region, early artistic expressions were integrated into architecture, navigation, and ritual. Canoe ornaments bore protective deities; house posts and beams were carved with ancestral faces; and textiles carried symbolic motifs tied to clan identity. This convergence of utility, spirituality, and aesthetics remains a defining feature of Polynesian art to this day.
Rock art constitutes some of the earliest surviving visual expressions in Polynesia, preserved in both petroglyphs (incised or pecked designs) and pictographs (painted images). In Hawaiʻi, extensive petroglyph fields such as Puʻuloa on Hawaiʻi Island contain thousands of motifs, human figures, concentric circles, canoe outlines, and footprints, that likely record genealogies, significant voyages, or ritual events (Lee and Stasack 45–48). Their locations, often near heiau (temples) or along traditional pathways, underscore their ceremonial and mnemonic functions.
On Rapa Nui, petroglyphs are concentrated in areas such as Orongo, the ceremonial village associated with the tangata manu (“birdman”) ritual. Designs depict the sacred frigate bird (manutara), the creator god Makemake, and maritime motifs, rendered in a flowing, curvilinear style. These carvings are not mere decoration but encode mythic narratives central to Rapa Nui religious life (Lee 152–154). The integration of rock art with ceremonial architecture suggests that these markings were active participants in ritual space, embodying ancestral presence.
The monumental stone statues (moai) of Rapa Nui remain among the most iconic works of Polynesian art. Carved primarily from volcanic tuff at the quarry of Rano Raraku, these sculptures range from under two meters to over ten meters in height, with characteristic elongated heads, strong brows, and minimal torsos. Many were fitted with pukao, cylindrical red scoria topknots, quarried separately from Puna Pau. Archaeological consensus identifies the moai as representations of deified ancestors, erected on stone platforms (ahu) with their backs to the sea, symbolically watching over their descendants (Van Tilburg 142–146).
The production of moai required sophisticated engineering and communal labor organization. Tools made of harder basalt were used for carving, and the statues were transported several kilometers to their ahu. Recent studies suggest that their movement may have involved a controlled “rocking” motion, allowing them to “walk” upright (Lipo et al. 29–32). The sheer scale and number, nearly 900 recorded, attest to the centrality of ancestral veneration in Rapa Nui society.
Unique within Polynesia, Rapa Nui also developed the rongorongo script, a system of incised glyphs carved onto wooden tablets, staffs, and other objects. Discovered by Europeans in the mid-19th century, the glyphs consist of stylized human, animal, plant, and geometric forms arranged in boustrophedon (alternating direction) lines. Although no definitive decipherment has been achieved, linguistic and ethnographic evidence suggests the script may have recorded genealogies, chants, or ritual knowledge (Fischer 34–39).
The loss of literacy in rongorongo is closely tied to colonial disruption; missionaries discouraged indigenous writing and oral traditions, leading to the near extinction of the knowledge needed to read the glyphs by the late 19th century. Today, surviving tablets, housed in museums such as the Bishop Museum and the Museo Antropológico P. Sebastián Englert, are regarded as both linguistic enigmas and masterworks of carving, reflecting the deep integration of writing and art in Rapa Nui culture.
Across Polynesia, carving traditions flourished in both functional and sacred contexts, utilizing the resources specific to each island environment. On basalt-rich islands such as Hawaiʻi and Rapa Nui, artisans carved stone using harder basalt or shell tools, while in wood-rich areas like the Marquesas and parts of French Polynesia, hardwoods such as toa (ironwood) and tamanu were favored (Kaeppler 64–65). Techniques often involved adze work for shaping, followed by fine chiseling and incising to create surface patterns, frequently resembling tattoo motifs, linking the object to its owner’s identity and genealogy. Carving was often an act of ritual significance, with specific chants or taboos observed to imbue the object with mana.
In Hawaiʻi, wood carvers (kālai kiʻi) produced kiʻi, sacred images of gods, destined for placement in heiau (temples). These figures, carved from native woods like koa or ‘ōhi‘a, are characterized by broad, grimacing mouths, large staring eyes, and powerful stances, embodying divine presence. Similar skill is evident in the moai kavakava of Rapa Nui, small wooden ancestor figures with emaciated bodies, carved with such anatomical precision that individual ribs are visible (Van Tilburg 198–200). These were worn or displayed during certain rituals, serving as talismans of ancestral protection.
In French Polynesia, particularly Tahiti and the Marquesas, carved human figures known as tiki (ti‘i in Tahitian) represent deified ancestors, demi-gods, or protective spirits. These figures are marked by symmetrical features, prominent eyes, and a frontal, compact stance. Often placed in sacred enclosures (marae), tiki served as intermediaries between the human and divine realms, protecting the community and reinforcing chiefly authority (Museum of Tahiti and the Islands, Object ID MTI-ACQ-1987-15).
Hawaiian ki‘i share these roles but are distinct in style; elongated proportions, deeply carved facial features, and complex headdresses. Both traditions exhibit a stylization that is instantly recognizable as Polynesian. A balance between abstraction and representational clarity that allows the figure to function as both symbol and embodiment.
Tattooing is one of the most enduring and culturally significant art forms in Polynesia, functioning as both personal adornment and a public statement of identity, rank, and lineage. In Samoa and American Samoa, the male pe‘a covers the torso from waist to knee with intricate geometric patterns, while the female malu adorns the thighs with more delicate motifs. These patterns are not arbitrary; each has a name, meaning, and genealogical reference (Mallon, Tatau 44–46). The application process is itself an art, employing bone combs (au) tapped into the skin with a mallet; a method largely unchanged for centuries.
In French Polynesia, pre-contact tattooing was widespread, with complex full-body designs in the Marquesas symbolizing status, life achievements, and protection from spiritual harm (Gell 197). Motifs such as concentric curves, stylized lizards, and chevrons also appear in carving and tapa designs, reinforcing a unified aesthetic system across media.
In Tokelau, tattooing was once practiced extensively, particularly in Fakaofo, with designs echoing Samoan forms but adapted to local narratives. However, 19th-century missionary influence, coupled with the depopulation caused by blackbirding (forced labor raids), led to the near-total disappearance of the practice (Mallon, Te Papa). For over a century, tatau was absent from Tokelauan life, remembered only in oral accounts.
The late 20th and early 21st centuries have seen a revival, spearheaded by artists such as Jack Kirifi, who have researched historic Tokelauan patterns and reintroduced them into contemporary tattooing. This revival is part of a broader cultural reclamation movement in Tokelau, linking visual heritage to community identity in the face of historical disruption.
Barkcloth production is one of the most widespread textile traditions in Polynesia, known variously as siapo in Samoa and American Samoa, ‘ahu in Tahiti, ngatu in Tonga, and kapa in Hawaiʻi. The process involves harvesting the inner bark of the paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera), soaking and beating it into thin sheets, and then decorating it with natural dyes. Patterns often include repeating geometric motifs, triangles, concentric circles, and plant forms, that encode clan symbols and regional styles (Pritchard 15–19).
In American Samoa, siapo is traditionally a female art, with women gathering to work collectively, reinforcing its role in both social cohesion and cultural continuity. Designs are applied using rubbing boards (upeti) carved with raised motifs or painted freehand. These textiles are used in ceremonial exchanges, as garments for high-ranking individuals, and as treasured heirlooms.
Weaving traditions are equally integral to Polynesian material culture. In Tokelau, women weave pandanus mats (fala) for everyday use and finely plaited mats (fau) for ceremonial occasions. These mats are highly valued and exchanged during weddings, funerals, and chiefly gatherings, functioning as both practical items and symbols of wealth and respect.
In Hawaiʻi, lauhala weaving, using pandanus leaves, produces mats, baskets, hats, and fans, often decorated with patterns similar to tattoo and tapa motifs. The transmission of weaving knowledge is highly gendered and intergenerational, with specific designs or techniques sometimes kept within families.
Hawaiian featherwork represents one of the most visually striking forms of Polynesian artistry. The ʻahu ʻula (feather cloaks) and mahiole (feather helmets) worn by aliʻi (chiefs) were created from thousands of feathers from native birds such as the ʻiʻiwi and ʻōʻō, attached to a netted fiber base. The bold red and yellow patterns were not merely aesthetic; they symbolized the wearer’s genealogy, divine favor, and political authority (Buck 112–114).
Featherwork required a sophisticated knowledge of both weaving and natural resource management, as bird populations had to be maintained to ensure a sustainable supply. The Bishop Museum’s collections demonstrate the extraordinary technical precision in aligning feathers to create seamless patterns.
Ceremonial objects throughout Polynesia materialize the concept of mana; the spiritual force that resides in people and sacred things. In the Cook Islands (outside the five focus territories but culturally comparable), “staff gods” (atua rakau) combine carved wooden figures with wrappings of barkcloth and feathers, embodying both male and female generative power (British Museum, Object Oc,LMS.19). Comparable objects in Samoa include kava bowls, war clubs, and carved house posts, often decorated with ancestral faces and abstract motifs.
These ritual items were never purely ornamental; their creation and use were bound by strict protocols, and their iconography was deeply tied to genealogy, mythology, and the spiritual well-being of the community.
Polynesian art is deeply rooted in oral tradition, with many works serving as visual manifestations of mythology. Across the region, stylized human figures in sculpture and carving often represent deified ancestors, demi-gods, or legendary heroes. On Rapa Nui, the moai are physical embodiments of forebears, their monumental presence asserting continuity between the living and the dead (Van Tilburg 142–146). In the Marquesas and Tahiti, tiki figures frequently reference Taʻaroa, the creator god, or local manifestations of the sun and fertility deities. Hawaiian kiʻi may depict the four major akua (Kāne, Kū, Lono, and Kanaloa) each with distinctive attributes, postures, and facial expressions.
These depictions were not merely representational; they were intended to house the spiritual essence of the being portrayed, transforming carved wood or stone into a living conduit for divine power (mana). The recurrent geometric patterns (spirals, triangles, concentric curves) often represent cosmological concepts such as the cyclical nature of life, the ocean’s waves, or genealogical branching.
Given the centrality of seafaring to Polynesian life, navigation-related art forms were both practical and symbolic. Canoe prows and stern posts were often carved with protective deity figures, believed to safeguard voyagers from storms and hostile spirits. These carvings could include animal motifs (sharks, frigate birds, turtles) each tied to specific myths of guidance and protection. In the Marquesas, canoe paddles themselves were art objects, with intricately incised designs echoing tattoo and tapa motifs.
While Polynesians did not create the elaborate stick charts of Micronesia, navigational knowledge was embedded in chants, star compasses, and visual mnemonics carved into sacred objects. Double-hulled voyaging canoes (waka, vaka, waʻa) were sometimes decorated with painted designs or inlaid shell patterns symbolizing key stars and currents, making the vessel itself a cosmological map.
The arrival of Europeans in the late 18th century initiated profound transformations in Polynesian artistic production. Early encounters, such as Captain James Cook’s voyages (Tahiti 1769; Hawaiʻi 1778; Rapa Nui 1774), resulted in the collection of numerous artifacts, carved figures, feather cloaks, tapa cloths, which were brought to Europe and displayed as ethnographic curiosities. Artists and naturalists on these expeditions, including John Webber and William Hodges, documented Polynesian life in drawings and paintings that would shape Western perceptions.
Missionary activity in the 19th century led to widespread suppression of religious imagery. Carved figures deemed “idols” were destroyed or removed to museum collections; tattooing was discouraged or outright banned in many islands; and ceremonial arts were reframed as “heathen” practices. However, contact also introduced new tools, such as metal chisels, which allowed for finer detail in carving and the adaptation of traditional forms for sale or exchange.
By the mid-19th century, a hybrid art economy had emerged in many territories: indigenous artisans produced objects for local ritual use and parallel works for the European market, often miniaturized versions of traditional forms such as moai, tiki, and kiʻi. These hybrid objects preserved certain motifs and techniques even as their original ritual contexts diminished.
In 1890, American painter John La Farge traveled to Samoa, producing a series of watercolors and sketches that document local life, landscapes, and ceremonial events. His works, now in collections such as the Yale University Art Gallery, capture subjects ranging from siva (dance) performances to scenes of daily fishing, rendered with a sensitivity to tropical light and color. La Farge’s field notes reveal both ethnographic curiosity and aesthetic appreciation, recording details of Samoan tattooing, chiefly regalia, and architectural forms (Yale University Art Gallery, John La Farge’s Second Paradise). While inevitably shaped by an outsider’s perspective, these watercolors provide a valuable visual record of Samoan culture at a time of significant political change, just before formal colonial partition.
Paul Gauguin’s Tahitian and Marquesan paintings profoundly influenced Western perceptions of French Polynesia. Arriving in 1891, Gauguin sought what he imagined to be an unspoiled paradise, though by then Tahiti had been deeply altered by French colonial administration and missionary influence. His canvases, such as Ia Orana Maria (1891) and Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? (1897), blend Polynesian and European iconography, often portraying Tahitian women in idyllic, timeless landscapes (Musée d’Orsay). Gauguin employed saturated color, flattened perspective, and symbolic forms inspired by both Polynesian motifs and his own invention.
While these works brought Polynesian imagery to a global audience, they also perpetuated an exoticized and romanticized vision that obscured the lived realities of colonialism. The tension between documentary and fantasy in Gauguin’s art continues to provoke critical discussion, especially among contemporary Polynesian scholars and artists.
Irish modernist painter Mary Swanzy visited American Samoa in 1924, creating a body of work that merges Post-Impressionist technique with Pacific subject matter. Her paintings, such as Samoan Scene (1924), depict dense vegetation, coastal villages, and figures engaged in daily activities, with forms simplified into rhythmic patterns and bold color fields (Irish Museum of Modern Art). Swanzy’s work differs from Gauguin’s in that it emphasizes environmental immersion and compositional abstraction rather than narrative exoticism. As one of the few women artists of her era to work extensively in the Pacific, Swanzy’s paintings provide a distinct lens on island life during the interwar colonial period.
Colonial governance, whether American, French, Chilean, or New Zealand, had a decisive effect on the trajectory of indigenous art in these territories. Missionary influence often resulted in the suppression of tattooing, the destruction of carved religious images, and the decline of certain ceremonial arts deemed incompatible with Christian morality. In Tokelau, tattooing was banned entirely in the 19th century under missionary and administrative pressure, resulting in its disappearance for over a century.
In Hawaiʻi, the overthrow of the monarchy in 1893 and subsequent annexation by the United States curtailed royal patronage of featherwork and temple carving, though certain forms were preserved through the Bishop Museum’s collecting efforts. In Rapa Nui, Chilean administration and land leasing to foreign sheep companies confined the island’s inhabitants to a small area, effectively halting large-scale carving until the mid-20th century. French Polynesia saw the commodification of certain crafts for tourism under colonial oversight, with artisans adapting motifs for export markets while sacred forms diminished in local ritual use.
While colonial systems often disrupted traditional transmission of skills, they also, paradoxically, preserved some forms in museums and archives. This dual legacy, loss alongside preservation, continues to shape the revival movements of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
In the late 20th century, several Polynesian territories experienced deliberate revivals of traditional carving. On Rapa Nui, local artists resumed the creation of moai, moai kavakava, and moai tangata; both for ceremonial use and as a form of cultural affirmation. Modern carvers employ stone and wood, often adapting ancestral forms with contemporary proportions or motifs. Similar revivals are evident in Hawaiʻi, where kālai kiʻi once again create kiʻi for cultural centers, hula halau, and community heiau reconstructions. These revivals not only restore technical skills but also reassert the cultural authority and spiritual value of the objects within their communities.
Tourism plays a significant role in the economies of French Polynesia, Hawaiʻi, and American Samoa, influencing the types of art and craft produced. Items such as shell jewelry, black pearl necklaces, carved wooden tiki, and printed fabrics featuring Polynesian motifs are marketed to visitors. While commercial production risks diluting traditional forms, it can also provide a platform for artisans to sustain heritage skills. In Tahiti, the black pearl industry has encouraged jewelry makers to incorporate traditional patterns into modern settings, blending cultural heritage with contemporary fashion.
However, the commercial art market often prioritizes easily recognizable “Polynesian” symbols, such as the tiki, sometimes detached from their original sacred contexts. This dynamic creates an ongoing dialogue within communities about the balance between cultural integrity and economic viability.
Cultural revitalization efforts in American Samoa, Tokelau, and Hawaiʻi have focused on reintroducing endangered arts. In American Samoa, community groups and schools teach siapo (barkcloth) production, fine mat weaving, and traditional wood carving. Tokelau has seen the reemergence of tatau, with artists researching historical motifs and integrating them into contemporary tattooing. In Hawaiʻi, the resurgence of kapa making, lauhala weaving, and featherwork has been driven by Native Hawaiian artists who frame their work as acts of sovereignty and cultural self-determination.
These revival movements often pair skill-based workshops with language programs, oral history projects, and ceremonial practice, ensuring that art is restored within its broader cultural ecosystem rather than as an isolated craft.
Despite the geographic distance and historical divergences among Polynesian islands, certain motifs remain remarkably consistent. Geometric forms such as triangles, chevrons, and zigzags appear across tattoos, carvings, and tapa patterns from Samoa to Rapa Nui. Animal figures, including sharks, turtles, and birds, carry shared symbolic meanings, often tied to navigation, fertility, and spiritual guardianship. Stylized human figures, whether the monumental moai of Rapa Nui or small wooden tiki from Tahiti, maintain a visual vocabulary marked by symmetrical features, a frontal stance, and an emphasis on the head as the seat of mana. These continuities reflect the enduring connections among Polynesian societies, reinforced through centuries of voyaging, intermarriage, and shared oral traditions.
Polynesian artists today operate in a globalized cultural landscape, navigating between ancestral heritage and contemporary artistic languages. Some, like Native Hawaiian kapa makers, integrate traditional patterns into abstract painting or installation art; others use digital media to animate navigation charts or tell oral histories. Climate change and environmental stewardship have become prominent themes, with artists incorporating oceanic imagery to advocate for the protection of ancestral waters.
Diaspora artists, whether in Aotearoa, the continental United States, or Europe, are also reinterpreting Polynesian forms in hybrid ways, combining urban graffiti, photography, or performance with traditional motifs. This multiplicity ensures that Polynesian art will remain dynamic, evolving in dialogue with both its own history and global contemporary art movements.
Polynesian art, in its vast geographic and cultural diversity, is unified by a shared ancestral heritage and an enduring connection between visual expression, spirituality, and communal identity. From the earliest Lapita patterns to the monumental moai of Rapa Nui, from sacred Hawaiian feather cloaks to the intricate tattoos of Samoa and Tokelau, these traditions embody the deep interweaving of art with navigation, genealogy, and cosmology. While colonial contact brought suppression, commodification, and disruption, it also, often inadvertently, preserved significant works in museum collections, enabling their study and eventual revival.
In the contemporary era, Polynesian artists navigate a complex interplay between preservation and innovation. Revival movements in carving, textile-making, and tatau not only safeguard technical knowledge but also reclaim the cultural authority of these practices. Globalized art markets and diaspora networks further complicate and enrich these dialogues, allowing Polynesian art to both affirm local identity and engage with global audiences. The persistence of shared motifs, geometric patterns, stylized human forms, and symbolic animals, attests to the resilience of an aesthetic system that has adapted to shifting contexts over centuries.
Ultimately, the art of American Samoa, French Polynesia, Hawaiʻi, Tokelau, and Rapa Nui reflects a continuum rather than a static heritage. A living tradition that, while rooted in ancient voyaging cultures, continues to chart new courses across the world’s oceans of meaning.
References:
Buck, Peter H. (Te Rangi Hīroa). Arts and Crafts of Hawaii. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press, 1957.
British Museum. Staff-God (Atua Rakau), Cook Islands. Object Oc,LMS.19. British Museum, www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Oc_LMS-19. Accessed 22 April. 2025.
Fischer, Steven Roger. Rongorongo: The Easter Island Script - History, Traditions, Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
Gell, Alfred. Wrapping in Images: Tattooing in Polynesia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Irish Museum of Modern Art. Mary Swanzy: Voyages. Dublin: IMMA, 2018.
Kaeppler, Adrienne L. Polynesia: The Mark and the Pattern. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1978.
Kirch, Patrick Vinton. On the Road of the Winds: An Archaeological History of the Pacific Islands Before European Contact. Rev. ed., Berkeley: University of California Press, 2017.
Kirch, Patrick Vinton, and Roger C. Green. Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia: An Essay in Historical Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Lee, Georgia. Rock Art of Easter Island: Symbols of Power, Prayers to the Gods. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, UCLA, 1992.
Lee, Georgia, and Edward Stasack. Spirit of Place: Petroglyphs of Hawai‘i. Los Osos: Easter Island Foundation, 2000.
Lipo, Carl P., Terry L. Hunt, Sergio Rapu Haoa, and Tradewinds S. M. Mulrooney. The Walking Megalithic Statues (Moai) of Easter Island. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 39, no. 2, 2013, pp. 299–310.
Mallon, Sean. Tatau: Samoan Tattoo, New Zealand Art, Global Culture. Wellington: Te Papa Press, 2010.
Tokelau Tattoo and Tattooing. Te Papa Blog, 1 Nov. 2013, blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2013/11/01/tokelau-tattoo-and-tattooing-tokelau-language-week-2013/. Accessed 22 April. 2025.
Musée d’Orsay. Paul Gauguin (1848–1903). Musée d’Orsay, www.musee-orsay.fr/en/artists/paul-gauguin. Accessed 22 April. 2025.
Museum of Tahiti and the Islands. Ti‘i Figure. Object MTI-ACQ-1987-15. Punaauia: Musée de Tahiti et des Îles, Collection of Polynesian Arts.
Pritchard, Mary J. Siapo: Bark Cloth Art of Samoa. Honolulu: Polynesian Press, 1984.
Van Tilburg, Jo Anne. Easter Island: Archaeology, Ecology, and Culture. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994.
Yale University Art Gallery. John La Farge’s Second Paradise: Voyages in the South Seas, 1890–1891. New Haven: Yale University Art Gallery, 2010.
Wow, this is so much incredible research. Well done!