Arabia Was Never Empty

Islamic Art, 7th Century to Present

Islamic art did not begin as an isolated invention in the seventh century. It emerged from a thick Late Antique world already shaped by sacred buildings, caravan cities, oasis kingdoms, royal images, inscriptions, pilgrimage routes, textiles, silver vessels, mosaics, rock art, funerary sculpture, and long distance trade. Arabia was not outside this world. It was one of its moving centers. The Arabian Peninsula connected the Mediterranean, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Sasanian Iran, East Africa, the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, and the Indian Ocean. Goods, ideas, scripts, artisans, stories, religious practices, and visual forms moved through these routes long before the rise of Islam.

The phrase Islamic art can be useful, but it must never suggest that a complete artistic tradition appeared suddenly with the first Muslim community. The earliest Islamic monuments were made in territories already shaped by Byzantine Christianity, Sasanian kingship, Jewish sacred imagery, Christian Arab frontier culture, Nabataean desert monumentality, South Arabian incense kingdoms, Palmyrene funerary art, and Arabian sacred landscapes. Early Islamic art inherited these visual languages, altered them, disciplined them, rejected some of them, and redirected others toward Qur’anic monotheism and caliphal authority. Its originality lies not in isolation, but in transformation.

The Dome of the Rock, rising from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, is one of the earliest and most powerful monuments of Islamic art. Built under the Umayyad caliph ʿAbd al Malik in 691 to 692, it transformed one of the most contested sacred landscapes in the world into a dazzling statement of faith, empire, memory, and divine presence. Its golden dome, octagonal form, Qur’anic inscriptions, and luminous mosaics do not emerge from a cultural vacuum. They speak in the visual languages of Byzantium, Sasanian Iran, Late Antique Jerusalem, and early Islam all at once. This is where stone, scripture, politics, and sacred geography meet.

Quseir Amra, Jordan, early eighth century. Built under the Umayyads, Quseir Amra is not a mosque, but a bath and reception complex where early Islamic court culture comes roaring into view. Its walls are covered with extraordinary frescoes of rulers, hunters, musicians, animals, bathing figures, and celestial imagery, reminding us that early Islamic art was never simply image free. Sacred spaces followed one visual language. Palaces, baths, and elite retreats could follow another. Here, in the Jordanian desert, empire, leisure, astronomy, power, and pleasure were painted directly onto the walls. Quseir Amra shows us an early Islamic world that was sophisticated, layered, and fully aware of the older Byzantine, Sasanian, and Late Antique traditions it was transforming. View of the site from north, Quṣayr ʿAmra, Jordan, 724–744 C.E. (Umayyad), stone masonry, interior decorated with wall frescoes and mosaic floors, patron: the prince al-Walid ibn Yazid ibn ʿAbd al-Malik (📸: Otto Nieminen/Manar al-Athar)

This is especially clear in two early Islamic monuments. The Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, completed under the Umayyad caliph ʿAbd al Malik in 691 to 692, uses Byzantine mosaic technique, imperial regalia, vegetal abundance, and Qur’anic inscription to make a new Islamic sacred claim in one of the most charged religious landscapes in the world. Quseir Amra in Jordan, an early eighth century Umayyad bath and reception complex, preserves figural murals of rulers, hunting, bathing, animals, and celestial imagery, proving that early Islamic visual culture was not simply image free. It was contextually careful, deeply political, and fully engaged with the artistic inheritance of Late Antiquity (Grabar; Milwright; Lesoon, Quṣayr ʿAmra). UNESCO describes Quseir Amra as an early eighth century Umayyad residence with a reception hall and hammam richly painted with figural murals, while Smarthistory places the site within Umayyad court culture.

Late Antiquity was not a cultural afterlife of the classical world. It was an age of visual reinvention. Across the eastern Mediterranean, North Africa, Arabia, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, and Iran, older Greek, Roman, Semitic, Persian, Jewish, and Christian forms were being remade through new religions, new empires, new routes, and new sacred geographies. The world into which Islam emerged was crowded with churches, synagogues, monasteries, shrines, city gates, tombs, palaces, coins, icons, mosaics, carved stone, silver vessels, textiles, and inscriptions. The Met’s Byzantium and Islam Age of Transition frames the seventh to ninth centuries as a period of dramatic change and continuity in the Byzantine Empire’s southern provinces, especially in the eastern Mediterranean and North Africa, where trade routes and religious communities overlapped before and after Islamic rule began (Evans).

San Vitale, begun c. late 520s, consecrated 547, mosaics date between 546 and 556. The Church was restored 1540s, 1900, 1904, and in the 1930s, Ravenna, Italy (📸: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Chancel with Justinian mosaic at lower left and apse mosaic at center, San Vitale, consecrated 547, Ravenna, Italy (📸: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Justinian mosaic, San Vitale, consecrated 547, Ravenna, Italy (📸: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Apse with Jesus Christ and St. Vitale at center, Justinian mosaic below at lower left, San Vitale, consecrated 547, Ravenna, Italy (📸: Steven Zucker, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Fragment of a Floor Mosaic with a Personification of Ktisis, Byzantine, 500–550, with modern restoration. The bejeweled woman, holding the measuring tool for the Roman foot, is identified by the restored Greek inscription as Ktisis, a figure personifying the act of generous donation or foundation. The man with a cornucopia, originally one of a pair flanking her, has the Greek inscription “good” by his head, half of a text that probably said, “good wishes.” The fragment, made of marble and glass tesserae (small pieces of colored material), is typical of the exceptional mosaics created throughout the Byzantine world in the 500s. The Metropolitan Museum, after acquiring the two figures independently, has restored them in accordance with a dealer’s photograph showing their original arrangement while in storage before separation.

Byzantine visual culture offered one powerful model of sacred empire. The mosaics of San Vitale in Ravenna, consecrated in 547, present Justinian and Theodora in jeweled procession, surrounded by clergy, soldiers, attendants, liturgical vessels, and gold space. The images do not merely portray imperial figures. They place imperial authority within a sacred order. That relationship between precious surface, ritual space, political sovereignty, and divine sanction mattered deeply for the visual world inherited by early Islamic patrons (McClanan). The Met’s Byzantine Fragment of a Floor Mosaic with a Personification of Ktisis, dated 500 to 550 with later restoration, shows how personification, glass tesserae, marble, Greek inscription, and donor imagery remained central to Byzantine visual language in the sixth century.

Plate with king hunting rams, Sasanian, ca. mid-5th–mid-6th century CE. The king as hunter had become a standard royal image on silver plates during the reign of Shapur II (A.D. 310–379). The theme, symbolizing the prowess of Sasanian rulers, was used to decorate these royal plates, which were often sent as gifts to neighboring courts. The king has various royal attributes: a crown and fillet, covered globe, nimbus with beaded border, and beaded chest halter with fluttering ribbons. The identity of the Sasanian king on this plate is uncertain. His crown identifies him as either Peroz (r. 459–484) or Kavad I (r. 488–497, 499–531). Sasanian silver bowls were usually hammered into shape and then decorated in various complex techniques. On this plate, separate pieces of silver were inserted into lips cut up from the plate to provide high relief. The vessel was then gilded using an amalgam of mercury and gold, which could be painted onto the surface, and niello—a metallic alloy of sulfur and silver—was inlaid. The result was a vessel of varied surface contours and colors.

Sasanian Iran supplied another major model. The Sasanian Empire ruled Iran and large parts of Mesopotamia from 224 to 651. Its art centered on kingship, sacred legitimacy, crowns, ribbons, pearls, fire altars, royal hunts, silver vessels, textiles, and cosmic order. The Metropolitan Museum notes that Sasanian imagery remained influential long after the dynasty’s fall, reaching early medieval Europe, Central Asia, China, and the Islamic world (Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Sasanian Empire). The Met’s Plate with King Hunting Rams, dated from the middle fifth to middle sixth century, presents the ruler as hunter, conqueror, and bearer of royal attributes. The museum explains that the king as hunter had become a standard royal image on Sasanian silver plates during the reign of Shapur II, and that such plates were often sent as gifts to neighboring courts.

Early Islamic visual culture grew between these two imperial languages. Byzantine mosaic, Sasanian royal signs, Arabian sacred geography, Jewish and Christian scripture traditions, and regional craft practices all shaped the first Islamic monuments. The result was not imitation. It was a new visual grammar formed from older artistic languages.

Pre Islamic Arabia was not visually empty. It included settled kingdoms, oasis towns, caravan cities, ports, tribal confederations, pastoral groups, sacred landscapes, and mobile communities whose material culture did not always survive in stone. Its visual world included inscriptions, rock art, funerary stelae, incense burners, temple remains, sacred stones, jewelry, weapons, textiles, tents, leatherwork, carved façades, and portable luxury goods. Some of this material is monumental. Some is small, movable, or embedded in landscape. All of it matters.

Robert Hoyland’s Arabia and the Arabs remains important because it presents Arabia before Islam as historically complex and connected to the wider ancient and Late Antique world. Ahmad Al Jallad’s work on Safaitic inscriptions is equally important because it reads prayers, ritual acts, grief, divine appeals, and movement from inscriptions made by pre Islamic nomadic communities themselves (Hoyland; Al Jallad). These inscriptions reveal a religious and social world that cannot be reduced to the later polemical idea of ignorance before Islam.

Oral culture was also central. Poetry, genealogy, praise, satire, lament, oath, and memory shaped identity across the peninsula. This does not mean Arabia lacked writing. It means that voice and inscription worked together. Michael C. A. Macdonald emphasizes the diversity of ancient Arabian writing and the coexistence of oral and written traditions across the peninsula (Macdonald). That relationship would become crucial in Islam, where revelation was recited, memorized, heard, written, copied, and eventually monumentalized in architecture and manuscripts.

The Arabian Peninsula. Before Islam, Arabia was never empty, silent, or cut off from the world. It was a vast crossroads of trade, pilgrimage, sacred landscapes, oral memory, inscriptions, caravan routes, oasis cities, ports, shrines, stones, textiles, and luxury goods moving between Byzantium, Sasanian Iran, Africa, Syria, Mesopotamia, the Mediterranean, and the Indian Ocean. This was the world the Qur’an entered. Not a blank desert, but a layered landscape already shaped by sacred power, visual culture, poetry, commerce, and memory. Islamic art would rise from this ground, transforming older languages of empire, devotion, movement, and material beauty into something new. 📸: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

The Arabian Peninsula connected worlds. Northern Arabia linked Petra, Hegra, Dadan, Tayma, Palmyra, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia, and Iran. Western Arabia connected pilgrimage routes and Red Sea trade. South Arabia faced East Africa, the Indian Ocean, and the incense routes. Eastern Arabia looked toward the Gulf and Sasanian Iran. Through these routes moved aromatics, glass, silver, ivory, ceramics, textiles, gems, spices, coins, manuscripts, animals, enslaved people, and artisans.

The Smithsonian’s Caravan Kingdoms Yemen and the Ancient Incense Trade placed ancient Yemen within a network linking southern Arabia to the eastern Mediterranean, northeastern Africa, and south and southwest Asia (Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art, Caravan Kingdoms). This trade was not simply economic. Incense was used in temples, churches, funerary rites, domestic rituals, and elite display. Its movement tied Arabian material culture to sacred practice across the ancient world.

This crossroads position helps explain why Islamic art became so materially and visually expansive. Early Islamic patrons inherited routes that already moved luxury objects, skilled labor, materials, forms, and symbolic systems. A silver plate from Iran, a silk from Central Asia, a mosaicist from Syria, a carved stone from an oasis, a Christian pilgrimage object from Palestine, and a South Arabian incense burner all belonged to overlapping systems of circulation. Islam did not create movement. It gave inherited movement new religious and political centers.

Mecca occupies a central place in Islamic sacred geography, but its pre Islamic material record is limited. Later Islamic literary traditions preserve the memory of the Kaaba as a sanctuary associated with pilgrimage, idols, sacred stones, and ritual movement before Islam. These traditions are important, but they are not the same kind of material evidence as the rock cut tombs of Petra, the inscriptions of Hegra, the funerary sculpture of Palmyra, or the painted synagogue of Dura Europos.

The Kaaba, granite masonry, covered with silk curtain and calligraphy in gold and silver-wrapped thread, pre-Islamic monument, rededicated by Muhammad in 631–32 C.E., multiple renovations, Mecca, Saudi Arabia (📸: Muhammad Mahdi Karim, GNU version 1.2 only)

Eastern corner of the Kaaba with the Black Stone, al-Hajar al-Aswad (📸: Saudi Arabia General Presidency of the Grand Mosque and the Prophet’s Mosque)

The Kaaba with kiswa, c. 1910 (📸: G. Eric or Edith Matson, Library of Congress)

The Kaaba’s pre Islamic significance should therefore be discussed with care. Smarthistory summarizes the traditional account that the pre Islamic Kaaba contained the Black Stone and images or statues associated with Arabian cults before Muhammad cleansed the sanctuary (Zucker and Harris, The Kaaba). Britannica similarly describes the Kaaba as a sanctuary associated with cult objects, a cloth covering, a well, and the Black Stone within the religious life of pre Islamic Arabia (Britannica, Arabian Religion). These accounts preserve crucial religious memory, but the surviving visual archive from Mecca itself is not comparable to the archaeological record of other Arabian and Near Eastern sites.

The Black Stone points to the importance of sacred matter without naturalistic figuration. A sacred stone can hold power through touch, placement, direction, movement, memory, and ritual rather than through resemblance. In that sense, pre Islamic sacred space already included forms of aniconic presence. Islam transformed this inherited sacred geography by binding the Kaaba to Abrahamic monotheism, Qur’anic revelation, the direction of prayer, and the hajj. Continuity and rejection worked together.

Pre Islamic Arabian religion included divine names, sacred places, stones, shrines, vows, sacrifices, images, inscriptions, and ritual movement. The evidence varies by region. South Arabia preserves temple remains, inscriptions, funerary stelae, and ritual objects. North Arabia preserves inscriptions, rock art, tombs, and oasis material. Western Arabia relies more heavily on later literary memory.

Al Jallad’s work on Safaitic inscriptions is vital because it reconstructs ritual life from the words left by pre Islamic nomads. The inscriptions record prayers, grief, offerings, divine appeals, and movement through landscape (Al Jallad). They reveal a world in which sacred presence was tied to place, memory, weather, protection, animals, and survival. They also complicate any simple idea that Arabian religion can be understood only through later accounts of idolatry.

Aniconism should not be treated as emptiness. Sacred stones, uncarved markers, veils, enclosures, wells, inscriptions, and direction can all carry powerful visual and ritual force. Later Islamic sacred art would often avoid figural imagery in mosques and Qur’an manuscripts, but it did not reject beauty. Instead, it developed other forms of visual intensity through script, geometry, vegetal ornament, light, surface, and space.

South Arabia was one of the most artistically sophisticated regions of the pre Islamic peninsula. The kingdoms of Saba, Himyar, Qataban, and Hadramawt developed temple architecture, irrigation systems, inscriptions, funerary sculpture, bronze objects, incense burners, carved alabaster, and luxury goods tied to the incense trade. The British Museum identifies ancient South Arabia as centered largely in present day Yemen and parts of neighboring regions, famous for incense and perfume and active before the rise of Islam (British Museum, Ancient South Arabia).

Head-Stela of a Man with a Full Beard South Arabian (Sculptor) 5th-2nd century BCE. The head of this funerary stela depicts an idealized man of high social status.

South Arabian funerary stelae show how memory and identity could be condensed into highly stylized forms. The Walters Art Museum’s Head Stela of a Man with a Full Beard, dated fifth to second century BCE, is made of calcite alabaster and described by the museum as the head of an idealized man of high social status (Walters Art Museum, Head Stela of a Man with a Full Beard). The face is frontal, simplified, and formal. It does not seek psychological likeness in a modern sense. It gives the dead a durable public presence.

South Arabian Face Stela from Wadi Bayhan, Yemen, early first century.

The Smithsonian’s South Arabian Face Stela from Wadi Bayhan, Yemen, dated to the early first century, belongs to the same broader tradition of stylized funerary commemoration. These works make clear that pre Islamic Arabia had figural traditions, not only aniconic ones. South Arabian art could be abstract, epigraphic, ritual, luxurious, architectural, and figural at the same time.

Incense burners also reveal how writing, ritual, and architecture could meet in a small object. South Arabian incense burners often compress shrine form, inscription, sacred fragrance, and elite display into portable ritual objects. They matter for Islamic art not because early Islam copied them directly, but because they show that Arabia already had strong traditions of inscription, sacred surface, stylized form, and material luxury before the Qur’an transformed Arabic writing into one of the central visual arts of the Islamic world.

Writing was central to South Arabian public and ritual life. Inscriptions recorded dedications, construction, lineage, offerings, repair, ownership, and divine appeal. Stone made speech durable. Writing made memory public. This is one of the deepest continuities between pre Islamic Arabian visual culture and later Islamic art.

South Arabian inscriptions were not passive records. They were visual acts. A carved text on stone claimed authority, marked devotion, and preserved identity. Later Islamic calligraphy would transform writing into sacred art through the Qur’an, but the visual force of inscription already had deep roots across Arabia. Macdonald’s work makes clear that the Arabian Peninsula had many writing systems and inscriptional traditions before Islam (Macdonald).

Luxury trade supported these visual forms. Incense, aromatics, metals, alabaster, textiles, and imported goods tied South Arabian elites to the wider ancient world. The wealth generated by trade made possible temple patronage, funerary monuments, and ritual objects. Early Islamic art inherited not one isolated Arabian tradition, but a peninsula long shaped by exchange.

The ancient city of Petra Al-Dayr (“the Monastery”) at Petra, Jordan. 📸: Shawn McCullars

Nabataean art transformed landscape into architecture. Petra, in present day Jordan, is one of the most striking examples of pre Islamic desert monumentality. UNESCO describes Petra as a Nabataean caravan city between the Red Sea and the Dead Sea, a crossroads between Arabia, Egypt, and Syria Phoenicia, half built and half carved into rock, where ancient Eastern traditions blend with Hellenistic architecture.

Petra was never just a ruin in the desert. It was a Nabataean city carved into the body of the mountains, a place where stone became architecture, memory, tomb, temple, road, and spectacle. These views move through some of its most extraordinary remains, from the rock cut grandeur of Ad Deir, the Monastery, and Al Khazneh, the Treasury, to the colonnaded city, tomb façades, painted interiors, mosaic floors, and the narrow passage of the Siq. Long before Islam, Petra stood at the crossroads of Arabia, the Mediterranean, Syria, Egypt, and the wider caravan world. Its façades speak in Nabataean, Hellenistic, Roman, and local desert languages all at once. Nothing here is empty. The cliffs hold trade, water, burial, empire, sacred power, and the astonishing fact that an entire city could be pulled from the living rock.

Petra’s façades are not simple copies of Hellenistic architecture. They translate pediments, columns, capitals, niches, and monumental fronts into sandstone cliffs. Tombs and sanctuaries become part of the mountain. Architecture becomes landscape, and landscape becomes memory. Petra also depended on water control. UNESCO emphasizes the city’s water management system, including channels, tunnels, diversion dams, cisterns, reservoirs, and temple and tomb architecture.

Once a thriving international trade hub, the archeological site of Hegra (also known as Mada'in Saleh) has been left practically undisturbed for almost 2,000 years. 📸: Eric Lafforgue/Art in All of Us/Corbis via Getty Images

Hegra, also known as al Hijr or Madā’in Ṣāliḥ, was a Nabataean city carved into the sandstone of northwest Arabia. These tombs rise out of the desert like architecture pulled from the cliffs themselves, with façades shaped by local Arabian traditions, Hellenistic forms, caravan wealth, and the same Nabataean world that gave us Petra. Before Islam, Hegra stood along the great trade routes linking Arabia, the Mediterranean, Syria, Egypt, and the wider incense world. Its carved tombs, narrow passages, inscriptions, and monumental façades remind us again that Arabia was never empty. It held cities, memory, water systems, sacred landscapes, and stone architecture powerful enough to make the desert speak.

Hegra, also called Madā’in Ṣāliḥ, extends Nabataean monumentality into northwest Arabia. UNESCO identifies it as the largest conserved Nabataean site south of Petra and notes its 111 monumental tombs, ninety four with decorated façades, along with inscriptions, cave drawings, and water wells. Hegra’s tomb façades turn desert rock into ancestral architecture. They also show how inscription, burial, status, and landscape were joined in pre Islamic Arabia.

Nabataean art is important for Islamic art because it reveals older Arabian and Levantine habits of carving identity into landscape, managing water, and joining architecture to movement. Later Islamic architecture would repeatedly return to water, inscription, courtyard, surface, and sacred direction. These concerns did not begin in the seventh century.

Funerary relief ca. 125–150. Inscription: (at right) 1 Nesha, 2 son of 3 [ ... ] (at left) 1 Belha, 2 (son of) Hashash. 3 Alas! Transliteration: 1 nšʾ 2 br 3 […] 1 blḥʾ 2 ḥšš 3 ḥbl This relief is a type of funerary monument characteristic of the prosperous caravan city of Palmyra during the first three centuries A.D. Reliefs with a representation of the deceased and a short identifying inscription were used to seal burial niches in elaborately decorated communal tombs; those with a half-length or bust format became prevalent sometime after A.D. 65. The relief depicts the upper body of a youthful, beardless man dressed in a Greek garment known as a himation, which wraps around his right arm like a sling, holding a small object, probably a schedula (book roll), in his left hand. His expression is serene, although the intensity of his gaze is emphasized by the large size of his eyes, the modeled eyelids, and the incised concentric circles indicating the iris and pupil of each eye. His hair is depicted as rows of uniform, stylized snail-like curls that cover his head like a cap. The sides and top of the head are rendered in detail, giving a three dimensional aspect to the relief. He stands in front of a dorsalium (draped cloth) affixed by rosettes to a pair of curving leafy branches. An inscription in Palmyrene Aramaic, visible directly to the right of his head, gives his name and lineage, ending with an expression of sorrow common on funerary reliefs at Palmyra. Another inscription, to the right of this one, names a different individual; originally, this slab was probably a double portrait that was cut into two after its removal from the tomb. Small chips and cracks in the surface are due to the use of soft local limestone. Traces of red pigment are visible in the inscription and on the two rosettes. Stylistically, the relief belongs to an early group of Palmyrene male funerary portraits dating to about 50–150 A.D., evidenced by the treatment of the coiffure and the figure’s beardlessness as well as by the manner in which the eyes are carved. In fact, the date can be narrowed further to late in this period (ca. 125–50 A.D.) on the basis of the sensitively modeled carving of the face and the use of pattern-like semicircular shapes among the folds of the himation.

Funerary relief ca. 50–150. This relief is a type of funerary monument characteristic of the prosperous caravan city of Palmyra during the first three centuries A.D. Reliefs with a representation of the deceased and a short identifying inscription were used to seal burial niches in elaborately decorated communal tombs; those with a half-length or bust format became prevalent sometime after A.D. 65. The relief depicts the upper body of a woman dressed in a draped garment, pinned at the left shoulder with an elaborate brooch, who faces directly towards the viewer. Her hair is covered by a turban-like headdress, made up of a wrapped cloth with a twisted border, worn over a diadem that covers her forehead. Long, wavy locks of hair fall behind her ears to her shoulders. Tiny plain rings cover the outer rims of her ears. She wears a long veil over her head which covers both arms, leaving only the hands exposed. The left hand holds a spindle and distaff, tools for spinning wool into yarn, which are associated with women’s domestic work. The right hand is held raised with the palm facing out, a gesture which may have been protective and is frequently seen on women’s funerary portraits from Palmyra. Her expression is serene, and her gaze does not meet the viewer’s but looks far into the distance. The iris and pupil of the eye are marked by incised concentric circles, and the eyebrows are indicated by modeled ridges. Her small mouth is framed by delicately modeled cheeks and chin, with the horizontal lines across the throat adding to the impression of fleshy softness. The relief can be stylistically dated to about 50-150 A.D. because of the hairstyle, and the patterned folds of the garment. An inscription which appears over her right shoulder, difficult to decipher, may have been added later.

Funerary relief ca. 2nd–3rd century CE. Inscription: (On left of reclining male figure) 1 Zabdibol, 2 son of Mokimu, 3 son of Nurbel, 4 son of Zabda, 5 [so]n of ‘Abday, 6 (son of) [Zabdi]bol. (By girl on right) 1 Tadmur, 2 his daughter. (By head of boy) 1 Mokimu, 2 his son. (By girl on left) 1 ‘Alayyat, 2 his daughter. Transliteration: 1 zbdbwl 2 br mqymw 3 br nwrbl 4 br zbdʾ 5 [b]r ʿbdy 6 [zbd]bwl 1 tdmwr 2 brth 1 mqymw 2 brh 1 ʿlyt 2 brth This sculpture in high relief shows full-length figures of a man, his son, and two daughters. It is a gravestone depicting a banquet scene that probably sealed the opening of a family burial niche in Palmyra. The man is reclining on a richly decorated couch, holding a palm spray or cluster of dates in his right hand and a cup in his left. The two daughters wear veils, necklaces, and earrings. The son wears a necklace and holds grapes in his right hand and a bird in his left. It bears a Palmyrene Aramaic inscription giving the names of each of the deceased and five generations of their paternal ancestors. By the mid-first century A.D., Palmyra — or "place of the palms"—was a wealthy and impressive city located along the caravan routes that linked the Parthian Near East with Roman-controlled Mediterranean ports. During the period of great prosperity that followed, the citizens of Palmyra adopted customs and modes of dress from both the Iranian Parthian world to the east and the Greco-Roman west. This blend of eastern and western elements is also present in Palmyrene art. In this sculpture, the care lavished on details of dress and jewelry recalls the Parthian approach to figural representation while the postures and the distinct sense of volume conveyed by the carving in high relief are Greco-Roman in style. Large-scale funerary structures were common in Palmyra. Vaults, some of which were belowground, had interior walls that were constructed to form burial compartments in which the deceased, extended full length, were placed. Sculpted limestone reliefs depicting the deceased and often carrying an Aramaic inscription giving the subject’s name and genealogy represented the "personality" or "soul" of the person. These were constructed as markers for eternity much like modern gravestones and mausoleums.

Left: Palmyrene Funerary Relief Bust of a Priest, c. 50–150 C.E., limestone, 63 x 52.5 cm (© Trustees of the British Museum, London); right: Palmyrene Funerary Bust of Tamma, c. 50–150 C.E., limestone, 50 cm high (© Trustees of the British Museum, London)

Palmyrene funerary relief of Viria Phoebe and Gaius Vurus, c. 50–150 C.E., limestone, 47.5 x 52 x 25 cm (© Trustees of the British Museum, London)

Limestone relief showing a funerary banquet, Palmyra, Syria, c. 200–73 C.E., 40.6 x 43.1 x 19 cm (© Trustees of the British Museum, London)

Palmyra, in present day Syria, was a caravan city where Roman, Parthian, Semitic, and local traditions met. Its funerary reliefs are among the most important surviving works of frontier visual culture. The Metropolitan Museum’s Palmyrene Funerary Relief, dated to the second to third century CE, shows a reclining man, his son, and two daughters in a banquet scene. The museum notes the Palmyrene Aramaic inscription naming members of the family and their ancestors, and describes Palmyra as a wealthy city along caravan routes connecting the Parthian Near East with Roman Mediterranean ports.

The relief is a family monument, but it is also a statement of cultural position. Dress, jewelry, inscription, banqueting posture, fruit, vessels, and familial grouping combine local identity with wider imperial forms. The British Museum’s Palmyrene funerary bust of a priest similarly uses dress, ritual objects, inscription, and frontal pose to make civic and religious identity visible.

Palmyra matters because early Islamic Syria inherited this world of frontier hybridity. Damascus did not become the Umayyad capital in a blank landscape. It stood within a region where caravan wealth, Greek and Aramaic language, Roman urbanism, local cults, Christian communities, and Iranian contacts had long overlapped. Early Islamic art in Syria emerged from this layered frontier.

Monumental Lihyanite Statue, Dadan, alUla, northwestern Arabia, fifth to third century BCE. Royal Commission for AlUla, on loan to the Musée du Louvre. 📸: Thierry Ollivier. This monumental Lihyanite figure does exactly what bad history insists Arabia could not do before Islam. It stands with force, scale, and royal presence, carved from sandstone in the oasis kingdom of Dadan, where caravan routes, inscriptions, sacred spaces, and political power met long before the rise of Islam. Probably representing a Lihyanite king, the statue reminds us that northwest Arabia was not an empty desert waiting to be written into history. It already had cities, rulers, stone sculpture, trade wealth, and its own visual language of authority. Here, the body becomes monument, and the desert becomes a record of power.

Northwest Arabia also produced major sculptural and inscriptional traditions. Dadan and Lihyan, centered around the oasis region of al ʿUla, were important nodes in caravan networks. Their visual culture included inscriptions, monumental sculpture, sacred spaces, and signs of royal display. The monumental Lihyanite statue from Dadan, on loan to the Louvre from the Royal Commission for AlUla, is especially important. The Louvre describes it as a 2.3 meter sandstone statue, probably representing an ancient Lihyanite king, dated from the fifth to third century BCE and discovered at Dadan in northwest Saudi Arabia (Musée du Louvre, A Monumental Lihyanite Statue).

The figure’s scale and frontal force challenge any assumption that pre Islamic Arabia lacked monumental figural art. Oasis kingdoms had their own languages of rule, body, public presence, and stone. Such works also place the Hijaz within a larger western Arabian world of oases, inscriptions, caravan routes, sanctuaries, and local kingship. Islam emerged in western Arabia, but western Arabia was already part of a much older network of movement and visual expression.

At Jabal Umm Sinman in Jubbah, the desert is not silent. It is written into stone. These petroglyphs preserve thousands of years of human and animal presence in the Hail region of northern Saudi Arabia, where ancient communities carved hunters, camels, ibex, cattle, horses, and inscriptions into the rock. Before cities, mosques, manuscripts, and monuments, there was already mark making, memory, movement, and sacred landscape. Jubbah reminds us that Arabia’s visual history did not begin with empire or Islam. It began with people leaving their presence on stone, turning the desert itself into an archive.

At Jabal al Manjor in Shuwaymis, the cliffs hold one of Arabia’s great visual archives. Across the rock faces of the Hail region, ancient communities carved animals, hunters, human figures, and signs of movement into the stone, leaving behind a record of survival, memory, and presence in the desert. This is Arabia before empire, before Islam, before manuscript and mosque. Not empty. Not silent. Already marked by image, ritual, landscape, and time. Shuwaymis reminds us that the desert was never a blank space. It was a living surface, and people were writing themselves into it long before history decided to pay attention.

Arabian rock art is one of the peninsula’s longest visual archives. The Rock Art in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia includes Jabal Umm Sinman at Jubbah and Jabal al Manjor and Raat at Shuwaymis. UNESCO states that the ancestors of present day Arab populations left numerous petroglyphs and inscriptions there, in landscapes once connected to fresh water and human and animal movement.

The Ḥimā Cultural Area sits along one of the ancient caravan routes of the Arabian Peninsula, where travelers, hunters, herders, and communities carved their presence into the desert over thousands of years. Its rock art and inscriptions preserve animals, human figures, hunting scenes, signs, names, and scripts left across stone surfaces that once marked movement, water, trade, memory, and survival. Before Islam, before manuscripts, before mosques, Arabia was already speaking through image and inscription. Ḥimā reminds us that the desert was never empty. It was a living archive, shaped by people passing through, praying, trading, remembering, and refusing to disappear.

The Ḥimā Cultural Area in southwest Saudi Arabia offers another major archive. UNESCO places it on one of the ancient caravan routes of the Arabian Peninsula and describes its rock art images of hunting, fauna, flora, and ways of life, along with inscriptions in Musnad, South Arabian, Thamudic, Greek, Arabic, and other scripts. The site’s ancient wells and caravan position make clear that rock art was tied to movement, water, passage, and memory.

These works should not be treated as primitive preliminaries to later art. They are visual records of human presence, animal life, ecological change, route marking, naming, devotion, and survival. They also restore mobile and semi mobile communities to art history. Monumental architecture tends to privilege settled states, but rock art reveals how people without permanent cities still shaped the landscape visually.

Much pre Islamic Arabian art was portable or perishable. Tents, textiles, leather containers, jewelry, saddles, weapons, garments, amulets, and animal equipment carried identity through movement. Because organic materials decay, the surviving archive favors stone, metal, and inscription, but that survival pattern should not mislead us. For mobile and semi mobile societies, cloth could become architecture, jewelry could become wealth and lineage, and weapons could become social identity.

Textiles are especially important. A tent can create an interior. A hanging can divide space. A garment can display rank. A woven border can move pattern across geography. Later Islamic art would give enormous importance to textiles, from tiraz garments and court robes to carpets, banners, hangings, and tent interiors. This later richness drew from many traditions, including Byzantine, Sasanian, Coptic, Central Asian, and Arabian forms. Still, Arabian mobility made portable surfaces especially meaningful.

Portable culture also helps explain Islamic art’s later love of surface. Walls could behave like textiles. Carpets could behave like gardens. Manuscript pages could behave like woven fields. Ornament could spread across architecture as rhythm, repetition, border, and light.

Imported luxury goods shaped visual expectation across Late Antiquity. Glass, silver, silk, ivory, ceramics, gems, incense, spices, coins, manuscripts, and carved objects moved across Arabia and its neighboring regions. These objects were not simply possessions. They trained the eye to value brilliance, rarity, pattern, surface, and technical skill.

A Sasanian silver vessel could circulate outside Iran. A Byzantine textile could move into an Islamic context. A Jewish synagogue could use zodiac imagery drawn from Greco Roman visual language. A Christian church could include vegetal mosaics familiar across religious boundaries. Late Antique visual culture was not separated by modern categories of nation or religion. Forms moved.

Early Islamic art inherited this luxury world. Its later achievements in metalwork, ceramics, glass, textiles, manuscripts, and architecture belong to a long history of precious materials crossing borders. Islam did not create the desire for luminous surface. It redirected that desire toward new sacred and political meanings.

Byzantine Christianity shaped early Islamic art through architecture, mosaic, pilgrimage, manuscript culture, relic devotion, liturgical space, and sacred geography. Churches across Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Jordan, and Arabia used basilical plans, apses, domes, columns, marble revetment, mosaic floors, painted walls, icons, inscriptions, lamps, and reliquaries. These buildings organized movement, light, sound, hierarchy, and devotion.

Pilgrimage was central. Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Sinai, Rusafa, monasteries, martyr shrines, and holy tombs drew pilgrims across regions. Sacred sites generated objects, images, memories, and routes. Islam would later create its own sacred geography through Mecca, Medina, Jerusalem, pilgrimage, direction, and burial, but it did so in a world where pilgrimage was already a major visual and spatial practice.

Late Antique mosaics in Jordan, Palestine, and Syria show how sacred geography could be made visible through colored stone. Bowersock’s Mosaics as History remains important because it treats mosaics as evidence for social, religious, and cultural life in the Near East between Late Antiquity and Islam. The Met’s discussion of that work highlights the importance of city imagery, Christian and older mythic themes, and mosaic culture in Palestine and Jordan (Bowersock; Metropolitan Museum of Art, Mosaics as History).

The early mosque did not simply copy the church, but it emerged in a world full of churches, synagogues, palaces, shrines, and civic buildings. Columns, courtyards, domes, marble panels, mosaic surfaces, lamps, screens, inscriptions, and processional routes were already part of the architectural vocabulary of the eastern Mediterranean and Near East.

Islamic worship required different forms. The mosque needed orientation toward Mecca, space for communal prayer, a qibla wall, a place for proclamation, and eventually the mihrab and minbar. It did not need an altar in the Christian liturgical sense. It did not need icons as devotional mediators. Its sacred focus emerged through direction, recitation, community, and script.

Panoramic image of the Great Mosque of Damascus (detail). 📸: Theklan

The Great Mosque of Damascus, built under the Umayyads from 705 to 715, shows this transformation. Its mosaics use Byzantine technique and Levantine workshop knowledge, but the program avoids figural sacred narrative. Beatrice Leal’s Smarthistory essay on early Islamic mosaics emphasizes the prestige of mosaic in early Umayyad buildings, including the Dome of the Rock and the Great Mosque of Damascus, where golden landscapes of trees, buildings, and water suggest abundance without sacred figures (Leal). The result is neither church nor pure rejection of church art. It is an Islamic reworking of a shared Late Antique medium.

The synagogue at Dura Europos is one of the great shocks of Late Antique art. Buried in the Syrian desert and uncovered in the twentieth century, its walls preserved a painted Jewish sacred world that refuses every lazy assumption about ancient monotheism and images. These murals filled the synagogue with biblical history, sacred memory, architecture, ritual objects, prophets, rulers, women, children, processions, and divine intervention. The Torah shrine, painted panels, and narrative scenes show a Jewish community fully engaged with the visual language of the wider Roman and Near Eastern world, but using it for its own sacred story. Before Islam, before the great mosque programs of the Umayyads, and long before anyone tried to pretend that Late Antique sacred art was simple, Dura Europos was already asking the harder question: what can an image do inside a holy space? Here, scripture did not remain only in the scroll. It moved across the walls.

Jewish art in Late Antiquity complicates any simple link between monotheism and image avoidance. The synagogue at Dura Europos in Syria, painted in the mid third century, contained extensive biblical wall paintings. Yale University Art Gallery describes Dura Europos as a crossroads of ancient cultures and notes the synagogue’s painted assembly room, along with one of the earliest Christian house churches (Yale University Art Gallery, Dura Europos).

The synagogue paintings include biblical scenes arranged in registers around the Torah shrine. Smarthistory’s discussion of the Dura Europos synagogue emphasizes the presence of narrative imagery connected to divine intervention, scripture, and communal memory (Hachlili). These paintings show that Jewish sacred art could be figural, textual, architectural, and deeply engaged with surrounding visual cultures.

The mosaic floor of the Hammath Tiberias Synagogue refuses every lazy idea that ancient Jewish sacred art was simple, plain, or image free. Here, the Torah shrine, menorahs, inscriptions, zodiac signs, personifications of the seasons, and Helios at the center of the cosmic wheel all share the same sacred floor. What makes this so powerful is the translation. A Jewish community in Late Antique Palestine took Greco Roman visual language and made it speak Jewish memory, ritual, time, and devotion. The sun god, the zodiac, and the seasons are not signs of abandonment. They are signs of adaptation. They show a sacred world where scripture, cosmos, synagogue, and image could meet beneath the feet of worshippers.

Late Antique synagogue mosaics in Palestine and the Galilee further complicate the question. Hammath Tiberias includes zodiac imagery, Helios, the seasons, menorahs, Torah shrine motifs, and inscriptions. Such works show Jewish communities using Greco Roman forms while giving them Jewish meaning. Islam emerged into this broader conversation about image, word, sacred law, and visual practice.

Sasanian royal art offered one of the strongest models for later Islamic court culture. Silver plates, rock reliefs, coins, crowns, textiles, and royal hunting scenes all presented kingship as cosmic authority. The hunt was especially important because it allowed the king to appear as master of violence, animal force, nature, and order.

Silver plate showing a king hunting lions; originally with a foot ring (AF5); traces of gilding survive in places, for instance on the background next to the ends of the ribbons trailing behind the king and on the disc of the crown supporting the globe at the top. Gilding on the back paws of the lion cub, head, shoulders, claws and rear of the upper lion, rear of the lower lion, crown, hooves, floating pompon balloons, edge of the saddle-cloth and ends of the shoulder ribbons, thus used as highlighting rather than over the reverse ground.

One of the earliest and most enduring of the royal images created during the Sasanian period (ca. 224-651) shows the king on horseback hunting select quarry: boar, lion, antelope (or gazelle). This image, often embellished with gilding, was depicted on the interior of silver plates, about thirty of which have been found in Iran and neighboring countries. Produced in imperial workshops, these plates were given as official gifts from the king to high-ranking individuals within or beyond the empire's frontiers. In the early centuries of Sasanian rule, silver production was controlled by a royal monopoly and could be minted into coins or fashioned into objects only on the king's authority. Although the royal figures on the plates are not labeled, they can sometimes be identified by their crowns, which are sometimes also shown on coin portraits of individual Sasanian kings. The figure on this plate is generally identified as Shapur II (reigned 309-79).

The Met’s Plate with King Hunting Rams shows the ruler with crown, fillet, nimbus, and fluttering ribbons, using silver, mercury gilding, and niello to produce a luxurious royal image. The British Museum’s Sasanian plate showing a king hunting lions preserves a similar courtly language of power. The Smithsonian’s Sasanian plate with a king on horseback confirms the wide importance of the mounted royal hunter in Sasanian elite imagery (Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art, Plate).

These vessels were portable statements of sovereignty. They could circulate as gifts, diplomatic objects, or elite possessions. Early Islamic court art would later continue the use of hunt imagery, musicians, dancers, animals, royal scenes, and luxury vessels in palace and secular contexts. What changed was the religious and political framework around them.

The Bahram fire temple

The Great Fire temple of Isfahan

Fire temple of Mazraeh-ye Kalantar

Sasanian rule was tied to Zoroastrian sacred order. Fire altars, crowns, investiture scenes, and royal inscriptions joined kingship to divine favor. Encyclopaedia Iranica defines fire altar as the stand on which sacred fire was placed for veneration, and Sasanian coins frequently link royal portraits with fire altar imagery (Encyclopaedia Iranica, Fire Altars). Betty Hensellek’s Smarthistory entry on Sasanian art explains how rulers used crowns, coins, and courtly imagery to communicate power within and beyond the empire (Hensellek).

Early Islamic art rejected Zoroastrian theology, but it inherited Sasanian territories, artisans, objects, and visual signs. Crowns, ribbons, pearl roundels, royal animals, and court textiles continued to matter. In the Dome of the Rock, crown imagery evokes conquered imperial power, but the building’s inscriptions and sacred setting subordinate those signs to Islamic monotheism. The old empire remains visible, but it no longer speaks for itself.

Arab identity before Islam was not confined to Mecca and Medina, and it was not religiously uniform. The Ghassanids and Lakhmids were Arab powers linked to the Byzantine and Sasanian worlds. The Ghassanids were Christian Arab allies of Byzantium, while the Lakhmids of al Ḥīra were tied to the Sasanian sphere. These groups moved between tribal authority, imperial diplomacy, Christianity, poetry, warfare, patronage, and frontier politics.

Irfan Shahîd’s work on Byzantium and the Arabs remains foundational for understanding Arab Christian participation in Late Antique imperial culture (Shahîd). Encyclopaedia Iranica describes al Ḥīra as a meeting point of Sasanian Persian culture, Nestorian Christianity, and Arabian paganism (Bosworth). This mixed setting matters because it proves that Arabic speaking and Arab identified elites were already part of imperial and Christian visual culture before Islam.

The rise of Islam did not bring Arabs suddenly into history. It reorganized a world in which Arab communities already moved through empire, religion, trade, and visual display.

The long rivalry between Byzantium and Sasanian Iran shaped the Near East before the Islamic conquests. Each empire claimed universal authority. Byzantium used the cross, imperial liturgy, gold mosaic, church architecture, relics, and sacred procession. Sasanian Iran used crowns, fire, silver, royal hunts, investiture, textiles, and court ritual. Their wars in the early seventh century exhausted both powers shortly before Muslim armies expanded into Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and Iran.

The Met’s Byzantium and Islam Age of Transition places these changes within the seventh to ninth centuries, stressing both transformation and continuity in the Byzantine southern provinces as Islamic rule emerged (Evans). Early Islamic art developed in the aftermath of this imperial struggle. It inherited churches, palaces, artisans, coins, administrative habits, and symbolic systems from both sides.

The Dome of the Rock is one answer to this world. It stands in Jerusalem, a city sacred to Jews and Christians, using Byzantine technique and imperial signs while proclaiming Islamic theology through Arabic inscription. Umayyad palaces and baths answer differently, preserving figural courtly forms closer to aristocratic Late Antique culture. Early Islamic art was born from empire, but it did not remain subordinate to empire.

Late Antique ornament was one of the major foundations of Islamic art. Vines, acanthus, palmettes, rosettes, pearl borders, medallions, birds, animals, fruit, baskets, trees, geometric interlace, and vegetal scrolls appeared across Byzantine, Sasanian, Coptic, Jewish, Christian, and Arabian contexts. These motifs were not owned by one religion. They were shared visual language.

Islamic art did not invent abstraction because it lacked images. It inherited Late Antique ornament and intensified its possibilities. Vegetal forms became more continuous. Repetition became more expansive. Geometry became more structurally ambitious. Script entered the field as both word and ornament. Surface became theological.

Mosaic detail from the Dome of the Rock

Interior view of the Dome of the Rock (Qubbat al-Sakhra), Jerusalem, 691–92 (Umayyad), stone masonry, wooden roof, decorated with glazed ceramic tile, mosaics, and gilt aluminum and bronze dome, with multiple renovations, patron the Caliph Abd al-Malik (📸: Virtutepetens, CC BY-SA 4.0)

Interior view of the Dome of the Rock with partial inscription (Qubbat al-Sakhra), Jerusalem, 691–692 (Umayyad) (📸: Virtutepetens, CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Dome of the Rock offers one of the most powerful early examples. Its mosaics include vegetal abundance, jewels, and crown forms associated with Byzantine and Sasanian power. Smarthistory emphasizes the presence of crowns, jewelry, and vegetal forms in the building’s golden interior (Zucker and Harris, The Dome of the Rock). Ornament here is not filler. It is the visual language of conquest, paradise, abundance, and divine unity.

Writing was already central in Arabia before Islam. Ancient South Arabian, Dadanitic, Safaitic, Hismaic, Nabataean Aramaic, Greek, Syriac, Hebrew, and developing Arabic scripts all circulated in different communities. Macdonald stresses that ancient Arabia had numerous writing traditions and that western Arabia was part of this broader inscriptional world (Macdonald).

The emergence of Arabic script from Nabataean and Aramaic traditions is one of the most important developments in the history of Islamic art. Nabataean Aramaic script gradually came to be used for Arabic in Late Antiquity, especially in northwestern Arabia and neighboring regions. Laïla Nehmé’s work on Nabataean and pre Islamic Arabic inscriptions from the al Jawf and ancient Dūmah region is central to understanding this transition (Nehmé).

This history is important because Islamic calligraphy did not appear from an absence of writing. The Qur’an gave Arabic script a new sacred status, but inscriptions had already marked graves, roads, offerings, names, ownership, devotion, and authority across Arabia and the Near East. Islam made writing one of the supreme arts of sacred presence.

Before Islam, script already carried authority. It named the dead. It recorded dedications. It marked tombs. It invoked gods. It identified patrons. It remembered construction. It fixed lineage. It claimed space. South Arabian inscriptions, Palmyrene Aramaic texts, Nabataean tomb inscriptions, Safaitic prayers, Greek church inscriptions, Hebrew synagogue inscriptions, and Sasanian coin legends all belonged to this wider world of written power.

Islam transformed script by joining it to revelation. Qur’anic inscription on architecture did not merely identify a building. It proclaimed doctrine. It corrected rival theologies. It sanctified space. It made divine speech visible. The Dome of the Rock’s inscriptions are among the earliest and most important examples. They assert the unity of God, place Jesus within Islamic theology, and speak directly within Jerusalem’s Jewish and Christian sacred landscape (Milwright).

The later centrality of calligraphy in Islamic art cannot be understood without this earlier world of inscription. Islam did not invent the visual authority of writing. It made that authority sacred in a new way.

The visual world before Islam was full of figures. South Arabian stelae showed stylized faces and bodies. Lihyanite sculpture monumentalized royal presence. Palmyrene reliefs represented families, priests, banquets, jewelry, and ritual objects. Dura Europos synagogue paintings presented biblical narratives. Byzantine churches and manuscripts represented Christ, saints, emperors, donors, and personifications. Sasanian silver plates showed kings hunting animals. The region into which Islam emerged was not image poor. It was image rich.

Early Islamic art did not encounter figuration as an alien form. It inherited figural traditions and sorted them by context. Figural imagery became especially difficult in sacred Islamic spaces where worship and divine representation were at stake. Yet figural imagery continued in palaces, baths, manuscripts, scientific works, luxury objects, and courtly environments.

Quseir Amra is where early Islamic art refuses to behave the way people expect it to. This Umayyad bath and reception complex in the Jordanian desert is covered with frescoes of rulers, musicians, bathers, animals, laborers, celestial imagery, and courtly pleasure. It is not a mosque. It is not image free. It is a painted world of power, leisure, politics, astronomy, and empire. These images show how layered early Islamic visual culture really was. Byzantine, Sasanian, Roman, and local Late Antique traditions all move through the walls, but they are being used for an Umayyad courtly language. The body, the hunt, the bath, the heavens, and royal authority all become part of the same visual program. Quseir Amra reminds us that Islamic art was never one thing. Sacred spaces had their own visual discipline, but palaces and baths could tell a very different story. Here, in the desert, early Islamic art is bold, figural, cosmopolitan, and completely alive.

Quseir Amra proves this complexity. UNESCO describes its reception hall and hammam as richly painted with figural murals reflecting secular art of the time. Lesoon’s Smarthistory essay places the site within Umayyad patronage and courtly imagination, with murals that include rulers, bath scenes, hunting, animals, and celestial imagery (Lesoon). The author correction is important here as well.

Islamic aniconism should not be treated as blankness or fear of beauty. It is better understood as a sacred discipline, especially in contexts of worship, scripture, and divine presence. Mosques and Qur’an manuscripts tend toward nonfigural visual programs because God is not represented, worship must not be confused with idol veneration, and sacred attention is directed through word, space, light, orientation, and pattern.

Pre Islamic Arabia helps explain this. Sacred stones, enclosures, veils, wells, inscriptions, and ritual movement show that presence did not require naturalistic figuration. Jewish and Christian traditions also contained intense debates about images. The Islamic visual field developed within this wider Late Antique conversation about what images could do, where they belonged, and when they became dangerous.

The achievement of Islamic aniconism is not absence. It is visual intensity through other means. Qur’anic calligraphy, vegetal mosaics, marble revetment, geometry, lamps, carpets, water, and architecture create sacred environments without divine figuration. The result is not less visual. It is differently visual.

Textiles were among the most important media linking Late Antique and Islamic art. They covered bodies, floors, walls, altars, beds, thrones, tents, and ceremonial spaces. They moved as trade goods, diplomatic gifts, taxes, tribute, burial materials, and signs of rank. In mobile societies, textiles could create architecture. In imperial societies, textiles could proclaim hierarchy.

Byzantine, Sasanian, Coptic, Central Asian, and Arabian textile cultures all contributed to early Islamic art. Pearl roundels, animal pairs, vegetal scrolls, geometric borders, and figural medallions circulated widely. Later Islamic tiraz textiles would add inscription to the body, turning garments into political and sacred surfaces. The fabric of power could be worn, gifted, displayed, folded, transported, and remembered.

This textile inheritance also helps explain Islamic art’s later treatment of architecture. Walls often behave like woven surfaces. Ornament repeats and expands. Borders frame fields. Pattern turns space into rhythm. The relationship between cloth, architecture, and authority is one of the deepest continuities from Late Antiquity into Islamic art.

Late Antique mosaics gave early Islamic patrons a medium of light, wealth, sacred order, and abundance. Christian and Jewish mosaics in the Near East included vines, animals, cities, rivers, donors, inscriptions, personifications, zodiac imagery, and sacred symbols. The medium was already associated with beauty, memory, and sacred space before Islam.

Early Islamic patrons retained mosaic but changed its meaning. In the Dome of the Rock, mosaic creates a golden interior filled with vegetal ornament, jewels, crowns, and Qur’anic text. In the Great Mosque of Damascus, mosaic landscapes of trees, buildings, and water create an image of abundance without figural sacred narrative. Leal’s account of early Islamic mosaics makes clear that mosaic remained one of the most prestigious media in early Umayyad architecture (Leal).

Water and garden imagery mattered because they joined ecology, power, and eschatology. Petra and Hegra depended on hydraulic knowledge. South Arabian kingdoms depended on irrigation. Sasanian and later Persianate traditions valued royal gardens. Christian mosaics used vines, rivers, fruit, and animals to evoke Eden and sacred abundance. The Qur’an’s gardens beneath which rivers flow gave Islamic art a powerful language of paradise. The garden was not decoration alone. It was life, sovereignty, promise, and divine generosity.

The Umayyad desert residences belong to both Islamic and Late Antique worlds. They include palaces, baths, audience halls, hunting estates, agricultural complexes, and elite retreats. Their locations often reveal relationships between land, water, tribe, pleasure, sovereignty, and display. They allowed Umayyad patrons to stage authority beyond the dense city.

Quseir Amra is the most important surviving painted example. Its reception hall and bath complex preserve courtly figuration, astrology, hunting, bathing, rulership, music, animals, and leisure. UNESCO emphasizes the importance of its figural murals in the reception hall and hammam. The paintings show that early Islamic patrons could embrace figural imagery in secular and courtly contexts while developing nonfigural sacred programs elsewhere.

This is essential for understanding Islamic art from the seventh century onward. Mosque, shrine, palace, bath, book, textile, vessel, and domestic object did not follow one identical visual rule. Islamic art was never one thing. It was a network of contexts.

The mosque emerged in a world already shaped by sacred and ceremonial architecture. Temples, churches, synagogues, shrines, monasteries, martyr tombs, palaces, baths, and pilgrimage centers all contributed to the built environment of the Near East and Arabia. Early mosques developed their own identity, but they did so through available forms and materials.

The mosque needed orientation, communal prayer, recitation, leadership, and a spatial focus toward Mecca. It did not need an altar or cult statue. It did not require sacred figural images. Its power came through direction, word, order, repetition, and community. Over time, the qibla wall, mihrab, minbar, courtyard, hypostyle hall, dome, minaret, inscription band, and lamp became part of Islamic sacred architecture.

This transformation was neither simple borrowing nor total rupture. Earlier forms were selected and reoriented. Columns, mosaic, marble, courtyards, domes, and inscriptions could remain. Their meaning changed because ritual changed.

The foundations of Islamic art lie in continuity and transformation together. Early Islamic patrons inherited Byzantine mosaic and changed its sacred program. They inherited Sasanian crown imagery and placed it within Islamic proclamation. They inherited Arabian pilgrimage and reorganized it around monotheism. They inherited inscriptional cultures and made Qur’anic Arabic visually supreme. They inherited figural imagery and restricted it by context. They inherited Late Antique ornament and intensified its nonfigural force.

The Dome of the Rock is the clearest example. It uses Byzantine technique, imperial regalia, vegetal abundance, and Arabic scripture in Jerusalem. It speaks to Jews, Christians, Muslims, and imperial memory at once. Quseir Amra shows another side of the same world, where courtly figuration, leisure, astrology, and rulership remained active. Together, these monuments prevent any simplistic account of early Islamic art. It was not merely aniconic. It was not merely borrowed. It was a new visual order formed through selective inheritance.

The term Islamic art is useful, but it can flatten difference. A Qur’an manuscript, a mosque, a ceramic bowl, a Jewish contract from Cairo, a Christian textile made under Muslim rule, an Umayyad bath fresco, a Sasanian inspired silver vessel, and an Abbasid luster bowl do not relate to Islam in the same way. Some are sacred. Some are courtly. Some are domestic. Some are commercial. Some were made by non Muslim artists. Some belong to Islamic art because they were made in lands ruled by Muslim dynasties.

For the seventh and eighth centuries, the category must remain especially flexible. Early Islamic art emerged from older workshops, older cities, older routes, older materials, and older artistic habits. Yet it also created something new. The Qur’an transformed Arabic writing. The mosque transformed sacred space. The caliphate transformed patronage. The hajj transformed sacred geography. The rejection of idolatry transformed the place of images. Islamic art is therefore not a style that arrived fully formed. It is the reorientation of Late Antiquity around a new revelation and a new community.

Islamic art was born from many older artistic languages. Its foundations include South Arabian incense burners, alabaster stelae, and inscriptions, Nabataean rock cut façades and water systems, Palmyrene funerary portraits and caravan wealth, Dadanitic and Lihyanite oasis sculpture, Hail and Ḥimā rock art, sacred stones and pilgrimage landscapes, Byzantine churches and mosaics, Jewish synagogue paintings, Sasanian silver plates, crowns, fire altars, textiles, and royal hunts, Christian Arab frontier kingdoms, and the luxury routes of the Mediterranean, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, and Indian Ocean.

The rise of Islam did not erase this world. It transformed it. Figures did not disappear, but their sacred use was restricted. Ornament did not remain secondary, but became central. Writing was not merely communicative, but sacred. Architecture was not only shelter, but direction, recitation, order, and doctrine. Water became paradise. Surface became theology. Empire became memory placed under Qur’anic proclamation.

To understand Islamic art from the seventh century to the present, its beginning must be placed before Islam, in Late Antiquity, in Arabia, in Byzantium, in Sasanian Iran, in Jewish and Christian sacred spaces, in caravan cities, in inscriptions, in portable textiles, in sacred stones, in rock art, and in the long movement of objects across land and sea. Islamic art did not emerge from a cultural vacuum. Its genius lies in how powerfully it transformed the world it inherited.

References:

Al Azmeh, Aziz. The Emergence of Islam in Late Antiquity Allah and His People. Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/emergence-of-islam-in-late-antiquity/

Al Jallad, Ahmad. The Religion and Rituals of the Nomads of Pre Islamic Arabia A Reconstruction Based on the Safaitic Inscriptions. Brill, 2022. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/54655/1/9789004504271.pdf

Bosworth, C. Edmund. Ḥira. Encyclopaedia Iranica. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hira/

Bowersock, G. W. Mosaics as History The Near East from Late Antiquity to Islam. Harvard University Press, 2006.

Britannica. Arabian Religion Sanctuaries Cultic Objects Practices and Institutions. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Arabian-religion/Sanctuaries-cultic-objects-and-religious-practices-and-institutions

Britannica. Black Stone of Mecca. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Black-Stone-of-Mecca

British Museum. Ancient South Arabia. The British Museum. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/galleries/ancient-south-arabia

British Museum. Palmyrene Funerary Bust of a Priest. The British Museum. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_1895-0401-7

British Museum. Sasanian Silver Plate with a King Hunting Lions. The British Museum. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_1897-1231-187

British Museum. South Arabian Calcite Alabaster Funerary Head. The British Museum. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_2003-1219-1

Evans, Helen C., editor. Byzantium and Islam Age of Transition. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2012. https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/byzantium-and-islam-age-of-transition

Flood, Finbarr Barry. The Great Mosque of Damascus Studies on the Makings of an Umayyad Visual Culture. Brill, 2001.

Fire Altars. Encyclopaedia Iranica. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/fire-altars/

Grabar, Oleg. The Formation of Islamic Art. Yale University Press, 1973.

Hachlili, Rachel. The Synagogue at Dura Europos. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/synagogue-dura-europos/

Harper, Prudence O., and Pieter Meyers. Silver Vessels of the Sasanian Period Volume One Royal Imagery. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1981. https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/silver-vessels-of-the-sasanian-period-vol-1-royal-imagery

Hensellek, Betty. Sasanian Art An Introduction. Smarthistory, 2020. https://smarthistory.org/sasanian-art-an-introduction/

Hoyland, Robert G. Arabia and the Arabs From the Bronze Age to the Coming of Islam. Routledge, 2001.

Leal, Beatrice. Mosaics in the Early Islamic World. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/mosaics-early-islamic-world/

Lesoon, Courtney. Quṣayr ʿAmra. Smarthistory, 2025. https://smarthistory.org/qusayr-amra/

Macdonald, M. C. A. Ancient Arabia and the Written Word. The Development of Arabic as a Written Language, edited by M. C. A. Macdonald, Archaeopress, 2010, pp. 5 to 28. https://www.academia.edu/4421409/Ancient_Arabia_and_the_written_word

McClanan, Anne. San Vitale and the Justinian and Theodora Mosaics. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/san-vitale/

Metropolitan Museum of Art. Fragment of a Floor Mosaic with a Personification of Ktisis. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/469960

Metropolitan Museum of Art. Funerary Relief. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/322375

Metropolitan Museum of Art. Mosaics as History The Near East from Late Antiquity to Islam. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2012/byzantium-and-islam/blog/book-club/posts/mosaics

Metropolitan Museum of Art. Plate with King Hunting Rams. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/322973

Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Dome of the Rock. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2012/byzantium-and-islam/blog/where-in-the-world/posts/dome-of-the-rock

Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Sasanian Empire 224 to 651. Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-sasanian-empire-224-651-a-d

Milwright, Marcus. The Dome of the Rock and Its Umayyad Mosaic Inscriptions. Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

Musée du Louvre. A Monumental Lihyanite Statue from Saudi Arabia Deposited from the Royal Commission for AlUla to the Musée du Louvre. https://presse.louvre.fr/a-monumental-lihyanite-statuefrom-saudi-arabia-deposited-from-the-royal-commission-for-alula-rcuto-the-musee-du-louvre/

Nehmé, Laïla. New Dated Inscriptions Nabataean and Pre Islamic Arabic from a Site near al Jawf Ancient Dūmah Saudi Arabia. Arabian Epigraphic Notes, vol. 3, 2017, pp. 121 to 164. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/54231

Shahîd, Irfan. Byzantium and the Arabs in the Sixth Century. Dumbarton Oaks, 1995.

Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art. Caravan Kingdoms Yemen and the Ancient Incense Trade. https://asia.si.edu/whats-on/exhibitions/caravan-kingdoms-yemen-and-the-ancient-incense-trade/

Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art. Face Stela. https://asia.si.edu/explore-art-culture/collections/search/edanmdm:fsg_S2013.2.165/

Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art. Plate. https://asia.si.edu/explore-art-culture/collections/search/edanmdm:fsg_F1934.23/

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Ḥimā Cultural Area. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1619/

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Hegra Archaeological Site Madā’in Ṣāliḥ. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1293/

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Petra. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/326/

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Quseir Amra. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/327/

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Rock Art in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1472/

Walters Art Museum. Head Stela of a Man with a Full Beard. https://art.thewalters.org/object/21.30/

Yale University Art Gallery. Dura Europos Excavating Antiquity. https://duraeuropos.artgallery.yale.edu/

Yale University Art Gallery. Synagogue. https://duraeuropos.artgallery.yale.edu/Synagogue

Zucker, Steven, and Beth Harris. The Dome of the Rock Qubbat al Sakhra. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/the-dome-of-the-rock-qubbat-al-sakhra/

Zucker, Steven, and Beth Harris. The Kaaba. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/the-kaaba/